ติดต่อเราตอนนี้!
ชื่อ:
อีเมลล์:
ข้อความ:
ข่าว

Our Video
'Councils, Not Police, Deal With Antisocial Behaviour'
October 2, 2009

 

'Councils, Not Police, Deal With Antisocial Behaviour'   27-Sep-09

 

 

Inquest into death of Fiona Pilkington and her disabled daughter hears superintendent voice frustration at justice system...

 

Most people do not realise that it is councils rather than the police who are primarily responsible for tackling antisocial behaviour, a senior police officer has told an inquest. 

Superintendent Steve Harrod, head of criminal justice at Leicestershire police, was speaking at the inquest into the deaths of a mother and her disabled daughter who had been tormented by local youths.

Harrod said officers got "frustrated" with a judicial system which generally gives young troublemakers reprimands and behaviour orders rather than putting them through the courts. He said it could be hard for officers to tackle ever-changing gangs of children and teenagers of the sort who tormented Fiona Pilkington and her family. However, he stressed to the inquest at Loughborough town hall that such an approach had a positive benefit in that young people not put into detention were far less likely to reoffend. The dual nature of tackling nuisance behaviour following the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act, which introduced antisocial behaviour orders, was perhaps not fully understood by the public, Harrod said. Police and council officials worked in "partnership", he said, adding: "I'm not sure people do know that low-level antisocial behaviour is mainly the responsibility of the council."

The policing of antisocial behaviour and abuse by young people has been a key issue at the inquest into the deaths of Pilkington, 38, and her severely disabled daughter, Francecca, 18. Their bodies were found in Pilkington's burned-out Austin Maestro in a layby close to her home in Barwell, near Hinckley in Leicestershire.

The inquest has been told that Pilkington felt "under siege" for more than a decade from a gang of 16 local young people, who pelted the family home with stones, mocked and taunted Francecca, and threatened and assaulted her son, Anthony, now 19.

Pilkington called the police 33 times but no one was ever charged with a criminal offence. Yesterday Harrod was asked by a juror why police were concerned at criminalising juveniles, given that if they committed a crime they "bring the criminalisation upon themselves".

Harrod replied: "From a police point of view, what we want to do with any criminals is to prevent re-offending. From my personal experience, if a juvenile goes in to detention, they are likely to mix with like-minded people during their time there and they are more likely to re-offend.

"I think for new police officers this is all part of their training while for older officers there is a transition. "But once you recognise that if you go to charge, and then the offenders come out of prison, you see them in the cells again and again."

The only action taken against the families of youths identified as being involved came through efforts by the borough council to impose antisocial behaviour agreements and, later, civil court action threatening one set of parents with arrest and eviction. Earlier the inquest heard social services were aware Pilkington was experiencing "suicidal thoughts".

Tony Howlett, service manager for people with learning disabilities at Leicestershire county council, said: "It was seen as more of a general expression of her anxieties at the bullying and harassment and not any sort of intention to commit suicide."

The inquest is expected to conclude on Monday

 

 

Filed under: UK Security News
Bookmark and Share

1 แสดงความคิดเห็น
1. The rise in "private policing" in the UK is a direct result of the disastrous rulr of the Labour Government. The UK is drowning in a sea of political correctness, multicultural madness and 12 years of insane, pseudo-Marxist social engineering. Violent thugs get away with a slap on the wrist and most police officers are sitting in the Nick filling out four hours worth of paperwork for one crime, even if it is only a shoplifitng offence. Meanwhile, violent gangs armed with machine guns fight it out in Britain's cities over control of the drugs trade and sex industry.

People simply do not feel safe anymore. Gangs of mouthy, aggessive 'youths' hang around The housing estates and make people's lives a pure misery. If the police are called they will take anything from three hours to TWO DAYS to respond. The Fiona Pilkington case is a perfect example of a system that has left the most defenceless citizens to fend for themselves. Despite receiving 33 desperate 999 calls in ten years, police dismissed Miss Pilkington as 'over-reacting' and classed her as 'low priority'. On one occasion she was forced to withdraw from giving evidence against the gang after her disabled son was threatened at knifepoint in the street. The police, of course, did virtually nothing and simply let the gangs drive a women to committ a muder-suicide. After all, they said they needed "proof" that a crime had been committed.

Little wonder then, that the latest trend in "private policing" is emerging. The security officers who make up these agencies are mostly mature, level-headed individuals with training in correct use-of-force techniques and as streetwise as you can get. They are not handcuffed by political correctness, they do not spend four hours at a time filling out a crime report, and can often deal with mouthy youths on a more "direct" level than the police do in this politically correct age.

"Shut your ignorant mouth and move along sonny, or you'll end up with a sore face."

Frankly, it works.

The trend of private policing is not new here in North America. The USA and Canada are seeing an uprecedented rise in security agencies protecting private homes, gated communities and even poor city housing estates. As an ex-pat Brit and the owner of a security agency here in Canada, I can attest first hand to the value of such additional services. Although no security service should ever try to rival or replace professional law enforcement agencies or police services, we CAN work together in partnership to keep our streets safe and deter crime. The head-butting between security firms and police services in the UK is counter-productive to say the least. Private security or warden services like Sparta Security in Darlington have already proved their worth by reducing crime and detering the yobs simply by being a reliable presence on the streets when the police are absent. If the various private security services and the police find a way to work in co-operation with one another in forging solid partnerships in helping to keep the streets safe, a great deal can be achieved. We work with the police here in the same way and have forged a very satisfactory relationship with them.
  Comment by (Bil Gibbons) - (Friday 11th of December 2009 09:09:07 PM)
 
ฝากความคิดเห็น
ชื่อ :*
อีเมลล์ :*
เวปไซต์ :
แสดงความคิดเห็น :*
ร่วมรับข่าวสารจอกเรา :
ยืนยัน :*
*
 
   
ลูกค้า เข้าระบบ
ชื่อผู้ใช้:
รหัสผ่าน:
 
แกลอรี่แสดงผลงาน
 

2010 © ดีเฟนท์ เซอเคียวริตี้ เซอวิส อังกฤษ & เอเชีย | ทรัพยากร | Solution by Kode Host Website Design | Resources